SOURCE: National Portrait Gallery
Everyone's favorite princess made headlines when her first official portrait was released by London's National Portrait Gallery. While the artist, Paul Emsley, is undoubtedly talented, Kate Middleton is looking a little... worn out, to say the least. Apparently Kate worked very closely with Emsley to create a "natural look." Don't get me wrong: I love Kate Middleton as much as the next person, but this portrait doesn't do her proper justice.
What are your thoughts on the painting?
Hi Ani!
ReplyDeleteI noticed your a new follower on my site so I stopped by to look at Catch-21 and can I say, your blog is ADORABLE! Im following! I'm new to the blogosphere, too. :]
This is an absolutely terrible portrait of Kate! What were they thinking, giving Kate a "natural" look...does she naturally look like a ghost? lol
Have a great weekend, Darling!
www.darlingprepster.blogspot.com
I completely agree! You would think she is like 40 from this portrait. It definitely isn't natural if it aged her so.
ReplyDeletexo
Tiffy
www.CuteLA.com
Oh wow, why does she look so old? And she has such a beautiful smile when she smiles with her teeth - this closed lipped smile just makes her look tired. She has so much life, where'd it go?!
ReplyDeleteI think they are trying to portray maturity and they aged her face so the portrait can be used many years from now as well. Thanks for posting this!
ReplyDeleteTaylor
pre-medprincess.blogspot.com
I think it makes her look a tad bit older, but it's a lovely painting.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you! I think she still looks beautiful, but it certainly doesn't do her justice.
ReplyDelete